 |
 |
 |
|
NIV in Acute Respiratory Failure
The use of BIPAP in acute exacerbations of chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has the most compelling
clinical evidence, according to Gregory Schmidt, MD,[2]
of the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. In
this setting, the inspiratory pressure can assist overloaded
ventilatory muscles, while the expiratory pressure can
reduce the breath triggering load imposed by intrinsic
positive end-expiratory pressure. The ideal patient
is one in whom impending respiratory failure is present
but in whom cooperation with a mask system is still
possible (ie, not in extremis). Multiple controlled
trials have shown that in this scenario, BIPAP reduces
the need for endotracheal intubation and may impact
subsequent mortality.[1,3] More recent studies have
also suggested that similar benefits may be obtained
when using BIPAP in COPD patients with delayed deterioration
while hospitalized.
There are fewer data supporting the use of NIV in
other forms of acute respiratory failure. In status
asthmaticus, observational data suggest benefit, but
randomized trials are lacking. In acute hypoxemic respiratory
failure, trials suggest a reduction in the need for
endotracheal intubation and better outcomes (although
this is not a universal finding).[4] The strongest of
these data come from the immunocompromised (especially
transplant) patient population, perhaps because they
are at particular risk for VAP.
Two other applications of BIPAP in acute respiratory
failure deserve comment. First, in the end-of-life patient
not wishing to be endotracheally intubated, BIPAP has
been shown to reduce dyspnea and, thus, potentially
reduce the need for sedation. Second, in the patient
with compromised lung function requiring conscious sedation
for procedures (eg, bronchoscopy), BIPAP has been shown
to be a useful modality to avoid endotracheal intubation
periprocedure.[5]
|
|
|
|
| 版权所有:好医生网站 |
|