¡ôThe Application and Implications
of ALLHAT
Disclosures
Linda Brookes, MSc
The results of ALLHAT (the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering treatment
to prevent Heart Attack Trial)[1] have, as expected, received much
attention. Their implications for antihypertensive treatment, not
least in the context of the recently released Seventh Report of
the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation,
and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) guidelines,[2] have
been widely discussed. Following the major press coverage of the
trial, it should now be well known that the ALLHAT investigators
concluded that thiazide-type diuretics are unsurpassed in tolerability
and in their effects on lowering blood pressure and reducing cardiovascular
complications. The investigators also concluded that their benefits
as first-line therapy apply to nearly all patients with hypertension.
On the basis of the study, the ALLHAT investigators made the following
recommendations:
1. Thiazide-type diuretics should be the drug of choice for initial
therapy of hypertension.
2. For the patients who cannot take a thiazide-type diuretic (which
should be an unusual circumstance), calcium channel blockers (CCBs)
and ACE inhibitors may be considered.
3. In black hypertensive patients, whose major risk is for a cardiovascular
disease event, thiazide-type diuretics (or CCBs in those who cannot
take a diuretic) are recommended over ACE inhibitors.
4. Some hypertensive patients require more than 1 drug. Diuretics
should generally be part of the antihypertensive regimen.
5. Lifestyle advice should be provided.
At the 2003 American Society of Hypertension meeting in New York,
NY, Curt D Furberg, MD, who was chair of the ALLHAT steering committee,
reviewed how the ALLHAT recommendations are already translating
into clinical practice in the United States.
Benefit in All Subgroups
ALLHAT prespecified a number of subgroups: gender, age (< 65
or >/= 65 years), ethnicity, diabetes, and comorbidity. No evidence
of any inconsistency of the benefits of diuretics was found among
them, Dr. Furberg reported. Importantly, in the black cohort, lisinopril
was less effective in lowering blood pressure than chlorthalidone
(by 4 mm Hg) and was associated with an increased risk of combined
cardiovascular disease and stroke. Some of this could be explained
by the difference in blood pressure lowering, but it is difficult
to determine how much of it was dependent on the difference in blood
pressure lowering and how much was dependent on other drug actions,
Dr. Furberg noted. It was reassuring that in the nonblack cohort,
lisinopril was similar to chlorthalidone, with a only slight excess
in heart failure, he added.
Diuretic Class Effect?
In ALLHAT, the thiazide-type diuretic used was chlorthalidone, a
drug rarely prescribed in the United States nowadays. A question
of particular interest, therefore, was whether the ALLHAT observations
with chlorthalidone could be extrapolated to other thiazide-type
diuretics. Dr. Furberg believes that they can, on the basis of evidence
from the literature. He pointed to a large number of placebo-controlled
trials with different diuretics that showed very similar significant
reductions in mortality or morbidity with different diuretics (Table
1).
Table 1. Benefits of Thiazide-Type Diuretics in Clinical Trials
| Diuretic |
Trial(s) |
| Bendrofluazide |
MRC |
| Chlorthalidone |
SHEP, HDFP |
| Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) |
VA, Oslo, Australian |
| Indapamide |
PATS, PROGRESS |
| HCTZ/amiloride |
MRC-O, STOP-Hypertension |
| HCTZ/triamterene |
EWPHE |
Australian = the Australian Therapeutic Trial in Mild Hypertension;
EPWHE = European Working Party on High blood pressure in the Elderly;
HDFP = Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program; MRC = Medical
Research Council hypertension trial; MRC-O = MRC trial of treatment
of hypertension in older adults; Oslo = the Oslo study; PATS = Post-stroke
Antihypertensive Treatment Study; PROGRESS = Perindopril Protection
against Recurrent Stroke Study; SHEP = Systolic Hypertension in
the Elderly Program; STOP = Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension;
VA = Veterans Administration Co-operative Study on Antihypertensive
Treatment
According to Dr. Furberg, these independent trial findings support
the view that all of the thiazide-type diuretics tested are beneficial.
The ALLHAT results indicated that all thiazide-type diuretics should
be considered for almost all patients with hypertension, including
untreated patients, inadequately controlled patients on nondiuretic
agent(s), and controlled patients on nondiuretic agents, unless
a compelling indication exists for using another agent. Whether
a patient who is controlled on a nondiuretic should be switched
to a diuretic should be a matter of clinical judgment, Dr. Furberg
added.
Second-line Therapy
As demonstrated in ALLHAT and other studies, a large proportion
of antihypertensive patients require additional drugs for blood
pressure control. ALLHAT did not directly compare second-line drugs,
however, so the optimal type of add-on agent cannot be deduced from
this trial. Dr. Furberg called for large trials to compare different
classes of agents added to diuretics, to define the optimal step-up
drugs. Thiazide-type diuretics, in low to moderate dose, should
be the treatment control group of all future comparative trials
in patients with hypertension, he believes.
Dr. Furberg would like to see a second trial, ALLHAT II, which he
proposes would be a double-blind, randomized clinical trial focusing
on a similar population to that of ALLHAT, but not controlled on
a moderate dose of diuretic. Patients would be randomized to a representative
of 4 drug classes: ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers
(ARBs), beta-blockers, and CCBs. The outcomes would be all major
cardiovascular outcomes, including heart failure, and it is Dr.
Furberg's dream that this study should be independent of industry
sponsorship.
Fixed Combinations
Dr. Furberg favors the traditional step-up approach as used in ALLHAT
and other studies, starting with a diuretic and adding other drugs,
rather then using fixed dose combinations.
Although fixed combinations have been widely discussed, they are
not cheap (Table 2), Dr. Furberg cautioned, whereas generics can
save patients money.
Table 2. Annual Cost of Fixed Dose Combination Agents[3]
| Drug Combination |
Branded/Generic |
Annual Cost/Patient (USD)* |
Lotrel 5/20
(CCB + diuretic)
|
Branded |
696 |
Hyzaar 100/25
(ARB + diuretic)
|
Branded |
677 |
Zestoretic 20/25
(ACE inhibitor + diuretic)
|
Branded and generic |
442
243 |
Ziac 5/6.25
(BB + diuretic)
|
Branded and generic |
430
243 |
Cost
Drug costs in the last year of ALLHAT were high, Dr. Furberg reported
(Table 3), and physicians must be sensitive to the fact that drug
costs are an important consideration for patients, he noted.
Table 3. ALLHAT: Drug Costs to Patients (United States, 2002)[3]
| Drug |
Annual Cost/
Patient (USD)* |
| Chlorthalidone |
36 |
| Amlodipine |
679 |
Lisinopril
Branded
Generic |
533
280
|
*Excludes licensing fee.
?Available as of third quarter of 2002.
The costs to society can vary widely (Table 4). Diuretics are the
least expensive drugs for treating hypertension, and expensive drugs
in most cases offer no added value, Dr. Furberg declared. Translating
the ALLHAT findings into practice will reduce the financial cost
of antihypertensive drugs, he believes.
Table 4. Drug Costs to Society
| Drug Class |
Average Annual Cost/Patient (USD)* |
No. of Annual
Users**
|
Total Drug
Cost (USD) |
| ACE inhibitors |
280-533 |
12.7 |
3556-6769 |
| CCBs |
679 |
9.3 |
6315 |
| Diuretics |
36 |
6.9 |
248 |
*Price of largest-selling drug/class (2002).
In millions.
Drug Sales
A question that has been asked by many is whether the ALLHAT results
have influenced sales of antihypertensive drugs. Dr. Furberg reported
that since the publication of the ALLHAT report, sales of thiazide-type
diuretics have increased, there has been no change in sales of loop
diuretics, and sales of chlorthalidone, which is hardly ever used
in the United States, have also remain unchanged. Prescriptions
of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) have increased from about 800,000
per month to over 1 million per month, an approximate 20% increase,
over this short period of time. Sales of lisinopril, branded and
generic combined, have increased steadily, but may now have reached
a plateau. Amlodipine sales remained unchanged. Dr. Furberg announced
that data for April 2003 show that HCTZ has now overtaken amlodipine
in terms of number of prescriptions.
Spreading the Word About ALLHAT
The ALLHAT investigators believe that it is important to disseminate
information about ALLHAT and its findings. A total of 34 papers
will follow the publication of the original report in JAMA. Media
coverage and presentations at major national meetings are planned,
and an ALLHAT Web site (http://www.allhat.org) has been set up.
Workshops with ALLHAT investigators will be given at 623 sites,
and interaction with formulary committees and academic detailing
will be used to spread the word about ALLHAT, Dr. Furberg announced.
±à¼ ֣´ޱ
|